If you are responsible for people who need this information and you cannot maintain it yourself, you can license it.
Your members ask what to do about AI, patient records, smart speakers and scam calls. Producing a good answer means reading primary sources, checking them against the law, and revisiting all of it every few months as companies change their terms. That is a permanent job and it is nobody's job.
So most bodies publish nothing, or publish something once and let it go stale. We found professional colleges with thousands of members and no guidance at all on choosing help, and regulator sites still hosting standards that were superseded in April.
Any influence over what it says. Not a veto, not a review, not a quiet word about a section. That independence is the entire value of the thing, and selling it would leave you with something worth nothing.
If a correction reflects badly on a tool your members use, it gets published anyway.
Professional colleges and associations. Employers with staff handling confidential records. Credit unions and insurers with members asking these questions. Libraries and community organisations.
This is cost recovery, not a business. The reference exists whether or not anyone licenses it. Pricing is a conversation, and it is closer to the cost of a single staff training session than to a software contract.
Not yet formally offered. If this is useful to your organisation, the reference is free to use in the meantime and always will be.